December 23, 2025

Originally published on Search Engine Land
Sources: Search Engine Land, Kalungi, Semrush AI Visibility Index, G2 2025 Buyer Behavior Report, Jordan Digital Marketing research, Elevation Marketing
How the limitations of AI search create strategic opportunities for B2B brands willing to think beyond generative engine optimization.
The rush to optimize for AI search is understandable. ChatGPT processes over 2.5 billion queries daily. Perplexity handles 780 million monthly searches with 20% month-over-month growth. Google's AI Overviews now appear on more than half of U.S. searches.
But in the scramble to master Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), many B2B marketers are overlooking a critical reality: AI search has significant limitations that create gaps competitors can exploit. Understanding these limitations isn't just academic—it's strategically essential for building a marketing approach that actually converts buyers, not just generates AI mentions.
This analysis examines the specific ways AI search falls short for B2B marketing and provides a framework for building an organic strategy that accounts for these gaps.
Based on research and practitioner experience, three specific limitations consistently emerge in B2B contexts. Each creates opportunities for marketers who understand them.
Traditional search marketing—whether SEO or PPC—has always been intent-based. It relies on pre-established awareness. People search for things they already know exist.
AI search inherits this limitation and, in some ways, amplifies it. Large language models are trained on historical data. They're excellent at synthesizing information about established categories, well-documented solutions, and widely discussed topics. They're significantly weaker at surfacing information about genuinely new products, emerging verticals, or innovative approaches that haven't yet accumulated substantial online discussion.
For B2B companies launching new products or creating new categories, this creates a timing problem. The period when you most need discovery—when you're establishing a new solution in the market—is precisely when AI search is least equipped to help you.
The strategic response:
The solution isn't to abandon AI optimization but to connect new offerings to established query patterns. This "Trojan horse" approach links your new product or service to an existing, better-established set of queries and themes.
If you've already created awareness around a related term or category, leverage it to redirect attention to your newer offering. The goal is to plant new seeds where awareness already exists, rather than waiting for AI models to catch up to your innovation.
For practical execution, this means creating content that explicitly bridges the familiar and the new. When prospects search for established solutions, your content should acknowledge the familiar category while introducing how your approach differs. AI models can then surface this content in response to queries about the established category, creating a pathway to your newer offering.
Unlike e-commerce, where the path to purchase is relatively short and direct, B2B buying requires layered, contextual information. Marketers need to help everyone from a CFO to an account coordinator feel confident in a purchase decision. This is not where AI search excels.
AI search models are excellent for what might be called "needle-in-a-haystack problems"—finding specific facts, definitions, or straightforward comparisons. They struggle with "haystack problems"—complex, nuanced questions that require deep contextual understanding.
Consider what a B2B buyer actually needs to evaluate a significant software purchase: industry-specific use cases, integration considerations for their particular tech stack, compliance implications for their regulatory environment, change management considerations for their organization size and culture, and ROI projections based on their specific situation.
AI can provide generic frameworks for these questions. It cannot provide the depth, specificity, and contextual nuance that complex B2B decisions require.
The strategic response:
This limitation actually represents an opportunity. While competitors chase AI mentions, you can differentiate by creating content that provides the depth AI cannot replicate.
The approach centers on what one strategist calls "triangulation": anticipating and building a presence across the places users go for information. That includes LLMs, but also Google, Reddit, industry listings, and especially owned media. The goal is to be present wherever prospects turn when AI falls short.
Specifically, this means:
The content that provides expert-level depth becomes increasingly valuable as AI handles more of the surface-level research. When AI gives the overview, you need to own the deep dive.
Hallucinations and misinformation remain ongoing issues for ChatGPT and its competitors. Newer models continue to aim to "improve accuracy," which itself acknowledges that accuracy remains a work in progress.
In B2B, where depth matters and decisions have significant consequences, this risk compounds. When you're trying to build confidence with a multi-party buying committee, AI-generated information carries inherent credibility concerns—even when it's accurate.
There's also a perception problem. According to research, Google's results are generally perceived as more trusted than ChatGPT's. Even if AI-generated information is accurate, B2B buyers conducting due diligence often want to verify through additional sources.
This creates a behavioral pattern that has significant implications for B2B marketers: buyers may use AI search to narrow options and create initial consideration sets, but they turn to traditional search, review platforms, and vendor websites to validate those options before making decisions.
The strategic response:
Think like your buyers: where will they go for validation once LLMs fall short?
The answer, consistently, is third-party validation sources. Since ChatGPT's launch, bottom-of-funnel research has continued to rely on assets like Google reviews, G2 or Capterra listings, and brand case studies—not on AI search results.
This means your AI optimization strategy needs to be paired with a robust presence on the platforms buyers use for validation:
Without these pieces, you risk a specific failure mode: generating AI mentions that create consideration but losing conversions because prospects can't find the validation they need to feel confident in their decision.
Understanding buyer behavior is essential for building an effective strategy. The research suggests a consistent pattern:
Top of funnel: AI search is increasingly effective for initial research—understanding categories, identifying potential solutions, and creating preliminary consideration sets. Buyers ask questions like "Compare the top three project management tools for remote teams under 50 people" and get synthesized answers that shape their initial thinking.
Middle of funnel: AI continues to play a role in deeper research, but its limitations become more apparent. Buyers need specificity that AI can't provide, and they begin supplementing AI responses with traditional search, vendor websites, and review platforms.
Bottom of funnel: AI search has minimal direct influence. Validation, due diligence, and final decision-making rely heavily on case studies, reviews, detailed use cases, and direct vendor engagement—none of which AI search delivers effectively.
This pattern has a critical implication: optimizing exclusively for AI visibility may generate top-of-funnel awareness while leaking conversions between the middle and bottom of the funnel. A complete strategy must address the entire journey, not just AI-driven discovery.
One of the practical challenges of AI search is measurement. Traditional SEO metrics don't tell the full story. Google Search Console offers limited transparency into AI Overview placements, and there's no equivalent to Search Console for ChatGPT or Perplexity visibility.
Teams are turning to proxy indicators:
Tools like Profound, Brandlight, and Evertune have emerged to track how answer engines surface and rank brands against competitors. Semrush's AI Visibility Index provides visibility data alongside traditional search metrics.
But the fundamental challenge remains: you're often measuring proxies rather than direct attribution. This means strategies need to be evaluated holistically rather than through AI-specific metrics alone.
Given these limitations, how should B2B marketers approach organic strategy? The answer is triangulation—building presence across multiple channels that collectively address the entire buyer journey.
Yes, you still need AI optimization. The goal is to be referenced when buyers conduct initial research through ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google's AI features.
Content types that consistently surface in AI results:
Optimization principles:
Traditional SEO remains essential, particularly for the deeper research that follows AI-driven discovery.
Focus areas:
The content that ranks well in traditional search often becomes the content AI references. These strategies are complementary, not competing.
This is where many AI-focused strategies fail. Without strong presence on validation channels, AI visibility generates consideration but not conversion.
Essential validation assets:
Your owned properties—website, blog, resource center, email—remain the only channels you fully control. As AI search evolves unpredictably, owned media provides stability.
Owned media priorities:
Research from Semrush's AI Visibility Index offers a cautionary tale. Zapier is the #1 cited source in AI responses for digital technology and software queries—but only #44 in brand mentions during actual discussions and reviews.
Why the gap? Zapier maintains an extensive library of integration guides and tutorials, giving it strong authority for AI training. But when people talk in reviews and discussions—the conversations that drive bottom-of-funnel decisions—competing brands come up more often.
The lesson: publishing content on your site alone is not enough. LLMs rely on specific platforms as authoritative sources. Your presence on these platforms—not just your owned content—shapes your visibility in AI responses and your credibility with buyers conducting validation research.
The B2B marketers who will succeed in this environment aren't those who optimize exclusively for AI or those who ignore it. They're the ones who understand where AI search adds value and where it falls short—and build comprehensive strategies accordingly.
Key strategic principles:
The companies that thrive won't be those that master GEO alone. They'll be the ones that understand AI's role in the buyer journey and build strategies that address the complete picture—including the significant gaps that AI search cannot fill.
Understanding the limitations is one thing. Implementing a strategy that accounts for them is another. Here's a practical roadmap for B2B marketers looking to build a more complete organic approach.
Week 1-2: Current State Assessment
Start by understanding where you currently stand across all four layers of the triangulation framework.
Week 3-4: Gap Prioritization
Based on your audit, prioritize gaps that have the highest impact on conversion. The most common high-priority gaps include:
Focus on content that serves multiple purposes. The most efficient approach creates assets that improve both AI visibility and bottom-of-funnel conversion simultaneously.
High-priority content types:
Activate validation channels:
Establish measurement baselines:
Here's the counterintuitive truth: understanding AI's limitations is actually a competitive advantage.
While competitors chase AI optimization metrics, you can build the complete infrastructure that converts AI-generated awareness into actual revenue. While others publish surface-level content hoping for AI mentions, you can create the depth that captures buyers when AI falls short.
The B2B buying process hasn't fundamentally changed. Buyers still need confidence before making significant decisions. They still seek validation from peers and third parties. They still require detailed information specific to their situation.
What's changed is the top of the funnel. AI search is transforming how buyers discover options and conduct initial research. But the middle and bottom of the funnel—where consideration becomes conversion—still requires the depth, specificity, and validation that AI cannot provide.
The marketers who recognize this will build strategies that generate both visibility and revenue. Those who focus exclusively on AI optimization will wonder why their impressive mention counts aren't translating to pipeline.
AI capabilities are improving rapidly. Will these limitations persist?
Some likely will. The fundamental challenge of emerging categories—that AI can only synthesize existing information—is inherent to how these models work. New solutions will always face a lag before AI can effectively surface them.
The depth limitation may partially improve as models become more sophisticated at synthesizing complex information. But B2B buying is inherently contextual. The specific needs of a 50-person healthcare startup differ from those of a 5,000-person manufacturing enterprise. AI can become better at acknowledging this complexity, but it's unlikely to replace the need for content that addresses specific buyer contexts.
The trust and validation challenge may actually intensify. As AI-generated content proliferates, buyers may become more—not less—reliant on third-party validation and verified sources. The proliferation of AI-generated content could make human-created, experience-backed content more valuable, not less.
The strategic implication: build for the world as it exists today while remaining adaptable. The core principle—that AI optimization must be paired with depth content and validation presence—is likely to remain relevant even as AI capabilities evolve.
The AI search revolution is real. Ignoring it is not a viable strategy for B2B marketers. But neither is treating AI optimization as the entirety of organic strategy.
The complete picture looks like this:
The B2B marketers who succeed will be those who understand where AI adds value and where it falls short—and build comprehensive strategies that address the complete buyer journey.
The goal isn't to choose between AI optimization and traditional approaches. It's to build a strategy that leverages AI for what it does well while compensating for what it cannot do. That's how you turn AI visibility into actual revenue.
Sources: Search Engine Land, Kalungi, Semrush AI Visibility Index, G2 2025 Buyer Behavior Report, Jordan Digital Marketing research, Elevation Marketing